Image (courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/University of Arizona) showing the location (green) of NASA's Curiosity rover landing on Mars within Gale Crater
But is this contemporary notion of space a real shift or does it represent only a different way to grasp remote space? or just a different way to express the relation between local space the space where our body moves and remote space, physically not present but perceivable? The relation between local and remote has been researched from the very ancient cultures, often originating myths, religious beliefs political and social systems. But a major difference can be traced. The widening of our contemporary horizon brought by the artificial extension of the five human senses is often divorced from the local environment. It seems that there is an increasing loss of contact with the physical world: permanent signs of human presence in the physical environment becomes increasingly meaningful.
....
excerpts from upcoming iBook
Signs, Between Earth and Sky
3-D view in front of NASA's Curiosity rover, which landed on Mars on Aug. 5 PDT (Aug. 6 EDT). The anaglyph was made from a stereo pair of Hazard-Avoidance Cameras on the front of the rover. The image is cropped but part of Mount Sharp, a peak that is about 3.4 miles (5.5 kilometers) high, is still visible rising above the terrain.
Image and caption courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/University of Arizona